Advocacia multifuncional e compliance: uma combinação necessária

Camile Souza Costa

doi:10.37497/RPD.v3i1.81

Authors

Camile Souza Costa Universidade do Vale do Sinos – UNISINOS, Rio Grande do Sul, (Brasil)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37497/RPD.v3i1.81

Keywords:

Multifunctional advocacy, Compliance, Legal strategy, Focus on the client

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the concrete changes and improvements needed for a multifunctional lawyering, which calls on the legal professional to act in compliance using the wide range of available technology with excellence, in order to become the specialized partner of its client. It addresses multifunctional lawyering as a professional activity carried out in a strategic partnership format, using technology side by side with human skills and technical legal skills (so-called, respectively, soft and hard skills), to improve the services provided and allow consistent structuring of compliance processes. Through the presentation of this new mindset, lawyering is seen as an activity carried out proactively, so that the lawyer leaves the unique role of “fighter”: who fights for the rights of the client, and starts to act also, and mainly, as a designer and “problem solver”: who designs environments/contexts and stimulates relationships that prevent conflict and uses creativity to solve it. The methodology is bibliographical, with empirical contributions, and the results are the verification of the benefits of the analyzed action.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Camile Souza Costa, Universidade do Vale do Sinos – UNISINOS, Rio Grande do Sul, (Brasil)

Mestranda pela Universidade do Vale do Sinos – UNISINOS, Rio Grande do Sul, (Brasil).

References

Barton, T. D. e Cooper, J. M. (2000). Preventive Law and Creative Problem Solving: Multi-Dimensional Lawyering. California: NCPL.

Barton, T. D. (2009). Preventive Law and Problem Solving: Lawyering for the Future.

Lake Mary, FL: Vandeplas Pub.

Fisher, R., URY, W. e Patton, B. (2018). Como Chegar ao Sim: como negociar acordos sem fazer concessões (tradução de R. Agavino). Rio de Janeiro: Sextante.

Genesereth, M. (2015). Computational Law: The Cop in the Backseat. CodeX: The Center for Legal Informatics. Stanford University. Recuperado de http://logic.stanford.edu/publications/genesereth/complaw.pdf

Haapio, H. Introduction to Proactive Law: A Business Lawyer's View (2006). In A Proactive Approach, Scandinavian Studies in Law, 49, 21-34. Recuperado de https://ssrn.com/abstract=2691940

Martins Costa, J. e Branco, G. L. C. (2002). Diretrizes Teóricas do Novo Código Civil Brasileiro. São Paulo: Saraiva.

Zavaglia Coelho, A. (2018). As 7 tendências para o uso de inteligência artificial no Direito em 2018. São Paulo: Thomson Reuters.

Esteban, M. J. e KLOTZ, J. M. (2017) President’s Task Force on the Future of Legal Services. Phase I - Drivers for Change in Legal Services. Sidney: International Bar Association – IBA.